Pete Ashdown is running
for U.S. Senate in Utah, and the state Democratic Party is
hoping on him to improve its chances of winning the Republican
state’s seat in 2006. Besides the usual Democratic positions,
he is courting young people of the iPod generation with his
stance on copyright law.
“Technology is becoming
the foundation of everything we do,” he said when asked which
issue was most important.
Q: Has
your view that copyrights should allow more things into the
public domain been popular with people you have met? Do you
think this is a realistic idea considering that the music and
movie industries are trying to retain their copyrights?
A: Most people I have
spoken with understand the societal benefit in allowing
material to age into the public domain. They also believe, as
I do, that authorship should be rewarded and individual
creators should be protected. I believe it is a realistic
idea because as the Supreme Court stated in Eldred v. Ashcroft
that Congress has the rights to limit copyright term. I think
reducing copyright term is a more popular idea with
technologists because of the rapid aging of technology.
Marketability tends towards zero after five years.
Q: You
disagree with the continuing use of oil. What do you think is
a good alternative to fossil fuels?
A: I don't disagree with
continuing the use of oil. What I disagree with is putting
all our energy needs into the hydrocarbon basket. Oil will
continue to have a place long after my lifetime. What we need
is balance in our energy policy and governmental support in
renewables such as solar, wind, and fusion. Algae biofuel
also holds great promise for reducing our dependency on oil.
My concern is also directed towards the health implications of
coal power generation. Utah has a coal plant in the middle of
the desert that California has recently decided not to buy any
more power from. That same location would work very well for
solar technologies. I would like to see that happen.
Q: What
has it been like as a Democrat in a Republican area?
A: I don't recall any
Republican who has treated me with anything but respect and
courtesy. Self-declared independents outnumber either party
in this state. Most Utahns vote on the individual rather than
blind-straight-party. The problem lies in getting my message
in front of them.
Q: What
do you plan to do to convince GOP voters to switch over for
once?
A: The fact that I am a
businessman who has dealt with balancing budgets and
income-to-debt ratios is an ideal that strikes to the core of
Republican ideals. I have firm beliefs in privacy and the
Bill of Rights, beliefs that I have put into action in my
business. My efforts towards transparency and openness in
government have had appeal across the line. Since my business
has run without a political agenda and has supported
non-profits and candidates across the spectrum, most people
realize that I'm striving for a better America rather than
party rhetoric.
Q: What
do you think are important issues facing voters on a statewide
level?
A: There is a huge
disconnect between not only the individual but local officials
and the Federal government. Where the Feds attempt to
micromanage in areas such as education, wilderness, and
homeland security, they fail disastrously in Utah. I want to
see more empowerment of locals and bottom-up management.
Q: Which
issue would you work on most if elected to the U.S. Senate?
A: Breaking down the
barriers of communication between the Federal government and
the people. Right now the government looks at interaction on
the Internet as a one-way street. We have more two-way
interaction with services like eBay than we do with our
government. The Internet continues to transform business and
communication, government needs to adapt and embrace
technology at all levels rather that continue to fight against
it.
Q: What is the most
important reason why you should be elected?
A: Technology is
becoming the foundation of everything we do. It is time we
had someone in the congress who knew more about it than where
the power button is.