November
27, 2001
During the
1950s, the fad in movies was oversized bugs and animals,
sometimes from space, battling the humans for control of
Earth. Humans won. For decades, children, and some adults,
have enjoyed comic books filled with Superheroes who battle
the forces of evil and protect the human race. Science
fiction has permeated entertainment from Frankenstein to
X-MEN to Jurassic Park I, II, and III. All fantasy, all
fiction, but biotech companies aren’t keeping it that way.
Never would
America think that such fantasies and science fiction would
ever become possible through scientific exploration and
biotechnology. Yet, it has. On November 25, Advanced Cell
Technology (ACT), based in Worcester, Massachusetts,
announced that it had successfully cloned a human embryo.
There is no doubt that the brave new world is upon us.
Science fiction lives.
ACT does not
intend to implant the embryo in a woman’s womb. Instead,
the biotech company plans to clone embryos and then kill
them for their stem cells in the name of
"research." The harvested stem cells are
ineligible for federally-funded research but that doesn’t
matter to ACT.
Michael West,
chief executive officer of ACT, claimed,
"Scientifically, biologically, the entities we are
creating are not an individual. They’re only cellular
life. They’re not human life." ACT further attempts
to deny the humanity of the cloned embryo by calling it
"activated cells." The fact remains that ACT
manipulated nature by creating an embryo without the process
of fertilization.
The company
knows that America is not on their side because the
"activated cells" were created to be destroyed. A
recent poll found 86 percent of Americans believe that
cloning an embryo to kill it is wrong. Cloned or not,
embryos deserve human rights or at least better treatment
than the eggs of endangered species.
No one should
really be shocked by ACT’s announcement. The
"accomplishment" was predicted for months. Cloned
humans was only a matter of time after the announcement in
February 1997 that scientists had made history with Dolly
the sheep, the first mammal cloned from an adult body cell.
We should
have expected to live science fiction, especially since
Dolly was not alone in the cloning farmhouse. In 1995, they
announced the arrival of Megan and Morag, Welsh Mountain
ewes, cloned from cultured embryo cells. Along with Dolly in
1996, Taffy and Tweed, cloned Welsh Black rams, were cloned
from cultured fetal cells. Interestingly, Dolly was not the
first cloned sheep; she was sheep number 277. Her fame came
from surviving implantation and birth while the others did
not.
In "The
Second Creation: Dolly and the Age of Biological
Control," Keith Campbell and Ian Wilmut at the Roslin
Institute detail their journey in creating Dolly and her
farmhouse friends as well as the scientific potential that
came with them. However, Wilmut wrote, "Yet, human
cloning is very far from Keith’s and my own thoughts and
ambitions, and we would rather that no one ever attempted it
. . . . the prospect of human cloning causes us grave
misgivings." But the technology was out of the
farmhouse and the petri dish.
Time and
technology were the only obstacles to cloning humans.
Scientists craved to know the unknown. A Presidential
Directive prevented the use of federal funds for cloning
human beings, but Congress never passed a complete ban to
stop the private sector from continuing this immoral
research. Scientists privately funded through biotech
companies saw no reason to stop at animals.
Advanced Cell
Technology did not announce how many human embryos were
created and destroyed during their experiments. Were mutant
embryos created? Why not implant the embryo into a woman’s
womb? Or is it more profitable to clone and kill while
playing on the heartstrings of the ill by suggesting hopes
of cures? Everyone dreams of cures, but we must not cross
the ethical line to permit the experimentation and killing
of an innocent human being to perhaps benefit another.
Not only is
cloning and killing wrong but it is unnecessary. The media
have grossly ignored the tremendous scientific achievements
in treating patients with adult stems cells. Stem cells from
adult tissues, bone marrow, and umbilical cord blood are
already used clinically and have proved beneficial in
treating brain tumors, cancer, strokes, and other diseases.
On July 31,
2001, the House of Representatives passed the Weldon-Stupak
Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001 to prohibit all
cloning aimed at creating a new human life, including for
reproduction or research. While some Members are only
calling for a reproductive cloning ban, a complete ban is
needed. Without one, the path is clear for embryo farms
where biotech companies clone, harvest, kill, sell, and
dissect baby body parts. Furthermore, the line between
research and reproduction is quite porous. The only way to
effectively ban human reproductive cloning is to also ban
cloning for experimental research purposes.
The halls of
Congress are swarming with high-paid lobbyists for biotech
companies who are defending the "right" to clone
and kill human embryos in the name of research, and the
politicians are listening. If Congress passes a
clone-and-kill law, federal law will require for the first
time that a life created in a lab must be extinguished.
Science does
not have definitive answers to tell us whether clones have
souls, whether super humans could be produced, whether
Parkinson’s would be cured, or whether cloning makes men
unnecessary for procreation. The common answer to every
cloning question is "possibly." What is clear is
that scientists do not want to be told no, but it is time to
do so.
The President
has stated that he will sign the House-passed bill to ban
human cloning. However, Senate Democrats are holding the
bill hostage. Considering the route and rate of science,
perhaps by the time the Senators finally debate human
cloning, their cloned-frog-human mutants will take over and
decide for them.
Miss Cole
is a contributing writer for PurePolitics.com and has been a guest on Fox News The O'Reilly Factor,
Hannity and Colmes, and Beyond the News, CNN Talk Back
Live, ABC's Politically Incorrect, MSNBC, United Radio
Network NewsMaker, USA Radio Network, and numerous
other programs.
-